Hey Charlie - the good news is I think you're pretty much 'good to go' in terms of taking this into Maya. The only elements I don't think work so well is the sign on the left-hand side structure - it's occluding too much and you're losing the 'shapeliness' of your individual elements. I'm wondering too if the foreground component on the left could introduce a bit more variance - i.e. not so exactly mirroring the component on the right. Just tweaks.
That said, in terms of your presentation of your production art and orthographs, I think you could up the professionalism; for example, your coloured production art of your components still look a bit like a thumbnail sheet, as opposed to something you could hand-over, and there's no information re. differing scales between the various elements. I'd like to see you move towards a more published portfolio of production art and orthographs in readiness for week 12 and submission.
OGR 19/11/2014
ReplyDeleteHey Charlie - the good news is I think you're pretty much 'good to go' in terms of taking this into Maya. The only elements I don't think work so well is the sign on the left-hand side structure - it's occluding too much and you're losing the 'shapeliness' of your individual elements. I'm wondering too if the foreground component on the left could introduce a bit more variance - i.e. not so exactly mirroring the component on the right. Just tweaks.
That said, in terms of your presentation of your production art and orthographs, I think you could up the professionalism; for example, your coloured production art of your components still look a bit like a thumbnail sheet, as opposed to something you could hand-over, and there's no information re. differing scales between the various elements. I'd like to see you move towards a more published portfolio of production art and orthographs in readiness for week 12 and submission.
Otherwise - get started!